Insights

Investment Management: Why a Good Investment Strategy Is About More Than Choosing Funds

wave divider paper
Investment Management: Why a Good Investment Strategy Is About More Than Choosing Funds

Investment Management: Why a Good Investment Strategy Is About More Than Choosing Funds

Investment management begins long before anyone selects a fund. A good investment strategy first defines what the money needs to do, when it may be needed, what risks the investor can carry and what trade-offs are acceptable. Funds are implementation tools; they are not the strategy itself.

This distinction matters because investors are constantly shown rankings, recent winners and confident forecasts. These can make investment planning feel like a search for the “best” fund. In reality, long-term outcomes are often shaped more by asset allocation, diversification, cost, tax, behaviour and consistency than by finding one exceptional product.

What Is Investment Management?

Investment management is the disciplined process of designing, implementing and overseeing an investment portfolio. It should connect a client’s objectives with a suitable mix of assets and a clear decision-making framework.

The process normally includes:

  • defining the purpose and time horizon of the money;
  • assessing required return, risk tolerance and capacity for loss;
  • setting an appropriate asset allocation;
  • deciding how to diversify across regions, currencies, asset classes and managers;
  • selecting suitable investment vehicles, funds and platforms;
  • understanding fees, tax and liquidity;
  • monitoring the portfolio against relevant objectives and benchmarks; and
  • rebalancing or changing the strategy for sound reasons.

Investment management may be provided through advice, a model portfolio, a discretionary mandate or a combination of these. The structure matters, but the central question remains the same: does the portfolio have a clear purpose and a repeatable process?

A Sound Investment Strategy Starts With the Goal

Money needed for a house deposit in two years has a different job from retirement capital intended to support income for 30 years. The first priority may be protecting the capital from a large short-term loss. The second may require meaningful exposure to growth assets so that inflation does not steadily reduce purchasing power.

That is why labels such as “conservative” or “aggressive” are not enough. Two investors of the same age can reasonably hold different portfolios because their income, liabilities, dependants, time horizons and ability to absorb losses differ.

A useful investment planning conversation asks:

  • What is this money for?
  • When could withdrawals begin?
  • How flexible is that date or amount?
  • What return is reasonably required after costs and tax?
  • How much temporary loss can the investor tolerate emotionally?
  • How much loss can the financial plan actually absorb?
  • What other assets, income sources and risks exist outside this portfolio?


The difference between tolerance and capacity is important. An investor may feel comfortable with risk but be unable to delay a withdrawal after a market fall. Another investor may dislike volatility but have a long horizon, strong income and substantial reserves. Good investment management considers both the person and the numbers.

Asset Allocation Usually Matters More Than Fund Selection

Asset allocation is the division of a portfolio among assets such as equities, bonds, property and cash, locally and offshore. Each behaves differently and plays a different role.

Equities can support long-term growth but may fall sharply over shorter periods. Bonds may provide income and diversification, but they also face interest-rate, inflation and credit risks. Cash offers stability and access, yet it may struggle to maintain purchasing power after tax and inflation. Listed property can provide income and growth exposure while remaining sensitive to economic conditions and interest rates.

The combination should be built around the goal. Selecting several highly rated funds does not guarantee diversification if they own similar assets. Conversely, a portfolio of individually good funds can still be unsuitable if the overall equity exposure is too high, offshore exposure is unbalanced or too much capital is illiquid.

For South African retirement funds, Regulation 28 places prudential limits on exposure to certain asset classes. Those limits help shape retirement portfolios, but compliance alone does not make a portfolio suitable. The asset mix must still reflect the investor’s circumstances, time horizon and broader financial plan.

Diversification Is More Than Owning Many Funds

Diversification means spreading exposure across genuinely different sources of risk and return. The goal is not to own as many holdings as possible. It is to reduce the chance that one company, sector, country, currency, manager or investment style determines the entire outcome.

South African investors often have significant local exposure before looking at their portfolios. Their salary, business, property and future spending may all be linked to the domestic economy and the rand. Offshore investing can broaden access to industries and markets that are underrepresented locally, while also introducing currency and foreign-market risks.

The right offshore allocation is not a prediction about whether the rand will strengthen next month. It should form part of a long-term investment strategy based on liabilities, goals and the combined household balance sheet. Moving large amounts only after a sharp currency move can turn diversification into market timing.

Manager diversification also needs thought. Combining managers who invest in a similar way may add complexity without meaningful diversification. A well-designed investment portfolio should be understandable: every component should have a role, and overlapping holdings should be intentional.

Costs, Tax and Structure Affect What the Investor Keeps

Investment returns are uncertain; costs are more predictable. A small annual fee difference can compound into a meaningful rand amount over a long period. This does not mean the cheapest option is automatically best. It means every layer of cost should have a clear purpose.

Depending on the structure, an investor may pay for advice, administration, discretionary investment management, underlying funds and transactions. Some funds may charge performance fees. Ask for the effective annual cost and a rand illustration, and establish whether quoted performance is before or after the relevant fees.

Tax also affects investment decisions. Interest, dividends and capital gains can be treated differently, and the consequences depend on the investor and the investment vehicle. Retirement funds, tax-free investments, endowments and ordinary discretionary investments each have different rules, benefits and restrictions.

The most tax-efficient product is not automatically the most suitable one. Access, investment choice, estate-planning consequences and future tax treatment also matter. Current tax limits and legislation should always be checked when advice is implemented.

Structure should simplify the strategy where possible. More accounts, products and funds can create extra administration, fragmented reporting and duplicated holdings. Complexity is justified only when it solves a real problem.

Behaviour Is Part of Investment Management

Even a well-designed portfolio can fail if the investor abandons it at the wrong time. Volatile markets create a powerful urge to act. When prices fall, risk suddenly feels obvious; after a strong rise, it becomes easy to believe the trend will continue.

A documented strategy provides a reference point when emotions are high. It records the goal, asset allocation, acceptable range, liquidity plan and reasons that would justify a change. Rebalancing then becomes a disciplined action rather than a reaction to headlines.

This does not mean “never change anything”. Portfolios should change when the goal, time horizon, required income, tax position or financial circumstances change. They may also change when an investment no longer performs its intended role, the manager’s process changes, costs become unreasonable or a better implementation becomes available.

The distinction is between a decision supported by evidence and one driven by discomfort. One role of an adviser or wealth management team is to help investors slow down, revisit the plan and understand the consequences before acting.

How Should an Investment Portfolio Be Reviewed?

A useful review looks beyond whether the portfolio went up or down over the last 12 months. Performance should be assessed over an appropriate period and against a benchmark that reflects the portfolio’s objective and risk.

The review should consider:

  • whether the goal or time horizon has changed;
  • whether withdrawals, contributions and cash reserves remain appropriate;
  • actual asset allocation compared with the intended allocation;
  • local and offshore exposure across the full portfolio;
  • risk taken to achieve the return;
  • performance after relevant fees and against suitable benchmarks;
  • manager, process or mandate changes;
  • tax, product or regulatory developments; and
  • whether rebalancing is required.


Short-term underperformance does not automatically mean a fund should be replaced. Different investment styles lead at different times, and chasing recent winners can lock in a cycle of buying high and selling low. On the other hand, patience should not become an excuse to ignore a broken process. A clear investment philosophy creates consistent criteria for both holding and changing investments.

Practical Example: One Goal, Two Different Portfolios

Imagine two South African investors, each with R3 million. Investor A plans to use most of the money for a property purchase within three years. Investor B is 45 and intends to invest the capital for retirement in roughly 20 years.

The rand amount is identical, but the investment strategy should not be. Investor A has a short horizon and a specific liability. A substantial market fall shortly before the purchase could cause permanent harm, so capital stability and liquidity deserve priority. Investor B has more time to recover from volatility and may need greater growth exposure to outpace inflation over two decades.

Choosing the same top-performing fund for both would ignore the purpose of the money. Good investment management begins with the liability and builds backwards.

Key Takeaways

  • Funds are tools used to implement an investment strategy; they are not the strategy itself.
  • Goals, time horizon, required return, liquidity and capacity for loss should shape the portfolio.
  • Asset allocation and genuine diversification are usually more important than collecting highly ranked funds.
  • Costs, tax and product structure influence the return an investor ultimately keeps.
  • Behaviour and a disciplined review process are essential parts of investment management.
  • Portfolio changes should be based on evidence, changed circumstances or a broken investment case—not headlines alone.


If you are unsure whether your investment portfolio has a clear purpose and a coherent strategy, an independent financial advisor can help you look beyond individual funds. The OBIN team would be happy to start with a conversation.

Picture of Johannes Burger

Johannes Burger

Johannes Burger CFP® is the Founder, Director and Wealth Manager at OBIN Wealth Management. With a financial planning career spanning more than 15 years, he focuses on helping clients make informed financial decisions through clear, objective and independent advice.

Mi-Jeanne Gerretsen

Administrative Assistant

Mi-Jeanne brings financial administration experience and a strong attention to detail to the OBIN team. She focuses on accuracy, efficiency and care across the administrative side of the client relationship.

Jacky Jordaan

Healthcare Adviser and Administrator

Jacky has experience across medical, corporate and financial-services environments and supports OBIN clients through healthcare advice, administration and operational coordination. Her role helps ensure the healthcare side of the client experience is organised, responsive, and personal.

Johannes Burger, CFP®

Director & Wealth Manager

Johannes founded OBIN Wealth Management in 2017 with the vision of creating an environment where financial planners can guide investors toward financial freedom through objective, independent advice. His financial planning career began in 2010; in 2013 he obtained a Postgraduate Diploma in Financial Planning from the University of Stellenbosch and qualified as a Certified Financial Planner®. As Key Individual and Representative, Johannes is involved in strategy, planning, client engagement and overall management.

Allan Geldenhuys, CFP®

Wealth Manager

Allan began his financial services career in 2012, initially working as a financial analyst before moving into financial planning. He works with individuals, families, businesses and trusts to make informed financial decisions and implement effective strategies. Allan is a Certified Financial Planner® and member of the Financial Planning Institute of Southern Africa.